Clarisa Fernandez vs Coco Vandeweghe Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W W W L
Form
L L L W L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Fernandez 1 - 0 Vandeweghe
They have played 3 sets in total, with Fernandez winning 2 and Vandeweghe winning 1. The last match between Fernandez and Vandeweghe was at the Mexico City, 19-11-2007, Semifinals, Hard with Clarisa Fernandez getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Clarisa Fernandez | 1 |
| Coco Vandeweghe | 0 |
Mexico City(19-11-2007)
6
7
6
1
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Osaka VS Bronzetti PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fernandez VS Vandeweghe H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | |||||
Fernandez VS Vandeweghe H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Clarisa Fernandez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Alize Cornet
Player
Clarisa Fernandez
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| F | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-5 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Coco Vandeweghe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Lys
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
52)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
63)
9
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Barbora Palicova
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
6
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Su Jeong Jang
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Carol Zhao
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
6
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
35%
(
17 of
49)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (141/91) | Win/Loss | 52% (308/281) |
| 59% (318/218) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (702/635) |
| 54% (2707/2301) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6388/6195) |
| 57% (58/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (178/180) |
| 65% (65/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (42/52) |
| 44% (4/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (18/15) |
| 64% (14/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (70/34) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.45 |
| 58 | Aces Total | 2782 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 84 | Total Double Faults | 2241 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:12:4 |
| 447.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 450.17 |
| 59% (980/1668) | 1st Serve % | 54% (16939/31631) |
| 63% (616/980) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (11991/16939) |
| 43% (303/699) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6985/14692) |
| 44% (87/199) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1407/3282) |
| 44% (689/1559) | Return Points Win % | 41% (13180/32476) |
| 61% (33/21) | Slam W/L | 50% (50/51) |
| 43% (6/8) | Masters W/L | 41% (44/64) |
| 67% (6/3) | Cups W/L | 67% (8/4) |
| 56% (42/33) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (108/94) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (49/26) | Challenger W/L | 59% (94/65) |
| 100% (5/0) | Futures W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 62% (139/225) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (301/566) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 43% (23/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (81/161) |
| 52% (38/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (84/172) |
| 84% (148/124) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (320/264) |
| 16% (148/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (320/52) |
| 19% (84/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (269/43) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
